<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAST to Solr for *NIX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Apache Lucene, Mahout, Solr, Tika and Nutch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Lawson</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/comment-page-1/#comment-7696</link>
		<dc:creator>J Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=327#comment-7696</guid>
		<description>Ok could have written that better, hurisearch now costs a quarter of what it did before our move to solr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok could have written that better, hurisearch now costs a quarter of what it did before our move to solr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webhamer Weblog: Search &#38; ICT-related blogging &#187; links for 2010-02-10</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/comment-page-1/#comment-7626</link>
		<dc:creator>Webhamer Weblog: Search &#38; ICT-related blogging &#187; links for 2010-02-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=327#comment-7626</guid>
		<description>[...] FAST to Solr for *NIX We very quickly switched to Apache Lucene, Solr and are very happy with the result. Performance is good, and we have cut hosting costs by a staggering 400%. (tags: solr) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FAST to Solr for *NIX We very quickly switched to Apache Lucene, Solr and are very happy with the result. Performance is good, and we have cut hosting costs by a staggering 400%. (tags: solr) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant_ingersoll</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/comment-page-1/#comment-7625</link>
		<dc:creator>grant_ingersoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=327#comment-7625</guid>
		<description>Yeah, obviously misstated by the blogger, more likely the case that they had a 40-50% reduction in cost (or more).  We have one client who went from 140+ servers down to roughly 30.  And the index size, for the same data and very similar search needs was significantly smaller than the previous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, obviously misstated by the blogger, more likely the case that they had a 40-50% reduction in cost (or more).  We have one client who went from 140+ servers down to roughly 30.  And the index size, for the same data and very similar search needs was significantly smaller than the previous one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Chaput</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2010/02/08/fast-to-solr-for-nix/comment-page-1/#comment-7623</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Chaput</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=327#comment-7623</guid>
		<description>How exactly does one reduce a number by 400%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly does one reduce a number by 400%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

