<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Stuff in Lucene and Solr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/01/03/new-stuff-in-lucene-and-solr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/01/03/new-stuff-in-lucene-and-solr/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Apache Lucene, Mahout, Solr, Tika and Nutch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant_ingersoll</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/01/03/new-stuff-in-lucene-and-solr/comment-page-1/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>grant_ingersoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=137#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>I would check the Local Solr home page on source forge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would check the Local Solr home page on source forge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianibbo</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/01/03/new-stuff-in-lucene-and-solr/comment-page-1/#comment-7138</link>
		<dc:creator>ianibbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=137#comment-7138</guid>
		<description>Hiya...

apols for posting here, stuggling to find an appropriate place at the intersection of lucene, solr and localsolr. It looks to me like the changes to around numeric fields in lucene 2.9.0 have broken local solr when it&#039;s built against solr 1.4-snapshot. I wondered if any of the named committers above have any insight on this? It&#039;s hard to tell if the problem lies in the use of sdouble for the lat and lng field definitions in schema.xml or something deeper in solr itself... Any ideas?

Best,
Ian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya&#8230;</p>
<p>apols for posting here, stuggling to find an appropriate place at the intersection of lucene, solr and localsolr. It looks to me like the changes to around numeric fields in lucene 2.9.0 have broken local solr when it&#8217;s built against solr 1.4-snapshot. I wondered if any of the named committers above have any insight on this? It&#8217;s hard to tell if the problem lies in the use of sdouble for the lat and lng field definitions in schema.xml or something deeper in solr itself&#8230; Any ideas?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/01/03/new-stuff-in-lucene-and-solr/comment-page-1/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/?p=137#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>I have just started looking into Lucene and it does look a very good software for searching. I am planning to learn Solr but I was wondering if there is a .NET version of Solr available somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just started looking into Lucene and it does look a very good software for searching. I am planning to learn Solr but I was wondering if there is a .NET version of Solr available somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

